Final Presentations

General Guidelines

Semi Finals

October 13th, 15:00, IE Tower, Floor 24

  • Pitch presentation and final presentation (if advancing) must be submitted by 13:00 on October 13th to the Coordinator of the TVB.

  • All team members must be present, but one or more can present.

  • Each team presents a 2-minutes pitch. Jury deliberates for 30 minutes.

    Note: A special award will recognize advanced projects (e.g., Venture Lab teams). Please apply the same five criteria, but judge them with higher expectations (in blue): readiness, traction, scalability, evidence-backed impact, and professional presentation.

  • Internal jury formed by IE faculty and mentors.

    1. Technical Work (20%): Assess the technical quality of the project's implementation, including the use of technology, feasibility, and alignment with the technical objectives of the program.

      Advance Ventures: Readiness: Is the technology sophisticated, defensible, and ready for real-world deployment (IP, prototypes, advanced integration)?

    2. Strength of the Business Model (20%): The implementation of the solution is likely to be desirable and affordable for customers, and the team has a plan for financial sustainability. A clear business model is presented.

      Advance Ventures: Traction: Has the model been validated (customers, pilots, revenue)? Is there proof it works beyond theory?

    3. Potential for Growth and Scaling (20%): The solution can be scaled to other regions and/or markets/sectors. The ability to develop and refine their project throughout the 12 days of the bootcamp is recognized, highlighting their adaptability, problem-solving skills, and perseverance.

      Advance Ventures: Scalability: Is there a clear go-to-market strategy? Can the project expand to bigger markets or other regions sustainably?

    4. Potential for Impact (20%): The implementation of the proposed solution/project has the potential to impact the specific sector/industry and our community in a responsible and positive way, adding significant value.

      Advance Ventures: Evidence-backed impact: Are there partnerships, adoption, or pilot results that demonstrate real-world positive value?

    5. Quality of the Presentation (20%): The project is presented clearly, relevant aspects are covered, and questions from the judges are well answered. The team members demonstrate a good understanding of the project.

      Advance Ventures: Professional presentation: Does the team pitch at an investor-ready level? Do they demonstrate passion, complementary skills, and handle Q&A with confidence?

    Each criteria has the same weight (20%)

    Each criteria have a maximum of 5 points (0-5)


Finals

October 13th, 17:00, IE Tower, Floor 24

  • Pitch presentation and final presentation (if advancing) must be submitted by 13:00 on October 13th to the Coordinator of the TVB.

  • All presentations will be delivered in person. Presentations may be delivered by one or more team members. However, ALL team members will attend in person.

  • Each finalist team presents a 5-minute presentation, followed by a 5-minute Q&A.

    Jury deliberates for 30 minutes.

    Note: A special award will recognize advanced projects (e.g., Venture Lab teams). Please apply the same five criteria, but judge them with higher expectations (in blue): readiness, traction, scalability, evidence-backed impact, and professional presentation.

  • External jury formed by industry and academic experts.

    1. Technical Work (20%): Evaluates the technical quality of the project's implementation, including technology use, feasibility, and alignment with the program's technical objectives.

      Advance Ventures: Readiness: Is the technology sophisticated, defensible, and ready for real-world deployment (IP, prototypes, advanced integration)?

    2. Strength of the Business Model (20%): Assesses whether the solution is desirable and affordable for customers, includes a plan for financial sustainability, and presents a clear business model.

      Advance Ventures: Traction: Has the model been validated (customers, pilots, revenue)? Is there proof it works beyond theory?

    3. Potential for Growth and Scaling (20%): Considers the scalability of the solution to other regions, markets, or sectors, and recognizes the team's adaptability, problem-solving skills, and perseverance demonstrated during the bootcamp.

      Advance Ventures: Scalability: Is there a clear go-to-market strategy? Can the project expand to bigger markets or other regions sustainably?

    4. Potential for Impact (20%): Measures the proposed solution's potential to positively and responsibly impact the specific sector or industry and the broader community, adding significant value.

      Advance Ventures: Evidence-backed impact: Are there partnerships, adoption, or pilot results that demonstrate real-world positive value?

    5. Quality of the Presentation (20%): Evaluates the clarity and comprehensiveness of the project presentation, the team's ability to effectively answer judges' questions, and their overall understanding of the project.

      Advance Ventures: Professional presentation: Does the team pitch at an investor-ready level? Do they demonstrate passion, complementary skills, and handle Q&A with confidence?

    Each criteria has the same weight (20%)

    Each criteria have a maximum of 5 points (0-5)

    • Prizes:

      • 1st Place: €450

        Awarded to the team with the highest overall score across all evaluation criteria. The winning project demonstrates strong technical execution, a solid and sustainable business model, clear potential for growth and impact, and an outstanding presentation.

      • 2nd Place: €375

        Granted to the next best team with an excellent balance of innovation, feasibility, and impact. This prize highlights projects that scored highly across the evaluation categories and showed strong adaptability and teamwork throughout the bootcamp.

      • Advanced Venture Award €375

        Reserved for teams that have already taken their project beyond the bootcamp (e.g., through participation in the Venture Lab). This award recognizes advanced projects that continue to excel in execution, scalability, and impact, while maintaining fairness for teams building ventures from scratch.

    • Additional Rewards:

      • Exclusive access to events and networking opportunities.

      • Recognition on IE University’s official channels.

    • Certificates: Digital certificate for all participants who attended at least 80% of the program.

Sustainable Impact Award

The Sustainable Impact Award is a new initiative launching at IE University’s Fall 2025 Tech Venture Bootcamp. Powered by Cinnovate under the EIT Higher Education Initiative and Horizon Europe, with support from EIT Climate-KIC, it aims to drive innovation and systemic change by integrating sustainability principles with technology.

🏆 What’s the Award About?
The award recognizes ventures that embed circularity and sustainability at their core. Winners will receive:

  • A 5-hour mentorship package with sustainability and entrepreneurship experts to continue accelerating your idea

  • A Certificate in Applied Sustainable Innovation upon completion

Projects will be evaluated using a structured rubric across six criteria (See below).

More Info about Cinnovate here

Assessment Criteria for Sustainable Impact Award

Jury members will assess participants using the Sustainable Impact Award rubric. They will evaluate submissions based on sustainability integration, circular economy principles, life cycle thinking, innovation, stakeholder value, and communication.

  • 25% Is sustainability clearly embedded in the project’s purpose, strategy, or operations? Are there defined environmental or social goals?

  • 20% Does the project consider systemic approaches such as circular economy, regenerative practices, or resource efficiency? Is there a shift away from linear models?

  • 20% Has the team identified key sustainability impacts (e.g. emissions, waste, equity)? Are there efforts to measure or estimate these impacts, even at a basic level?

  • 15% Is the solution novel in how it addresses sustainability challenges? Is it technically and economically viable, with potential for scale and positive impact?

  • 10% Does the project create meaningful value for users and communities? Are stakeholders (e.g. customers, partners, regulators) considered or involved?

  • 10% Is the sustainability story clearly communicated? Does the project contribute to broader goals (e.g. SDGs, climate action, social equity)?